Simon Gros

In the first two essays of this book, Louis Althusser analyses the work of two of the greatest thinkers of the Enlightenment – Montesquieu and Rousseau. He shows that although they made considerable advances towards establishing a science of politics, particularly in comparison with the theorists of natural law, they nevertheless remained the victims of the ideologies of their day and class. Montesquieu accepted as given the political notions current in French absolutism; Rousseau attempted to impose by moral conversion an already outdated mode of production. The third essay examines Marx’s relationship to Hegel and elaborates on the discussions of this theme in Althusser’s earlier books, For Marx and Lenin and Philosophy. Althusser argues that Marx was able to establish a theory of historical materialism and the possibility of a Marxist philosophy of dialectical materialism not simply by turning his back on Hegel, but by extracting and converting certain categories from Hegel’s Logic and applying them to English political economy and French socialist political theory.

Table of Contents

PART ONE: MONTESQUIEU: POLITICS AND HISTORY
Foreword
1. A Revolution in Method
2. A New Theory of Law
3. The Dialectic of History
4. ‘There are Three Governments…’
5. The Myth of the Separation of Powers
6. Montesquieu’s Parti Pris
Conclusion

PART TWO: ROUSSEAU: THE SOCIAL CONTRACT
Foreword
1. Posing the Problem
2. The Solution of the Problem: Discrepancy I
3. The Contract and Alienation
4. Total Alienation and Exchange: Discrepancy II
5. Particular Interest and General Interest, Particular Will and General Will: Discrepancy III
6. Flight Forward in Ideology or Regression in the Economy: Discrepancy IV

PART THREE: MARX’S RELATION TO HEGEL

DOWNLOAD: (.pdf & .epub)